EXCERPT:
BOLDUAN: “Friday night, after this report, 'The New York Times' report came out. You had said that if Rosenstein’s gone, you said something to the effect of everything would be on the table. Come January, if you were then — and Democrats were in the majority and then you could be the chairman of the Judiciary Committee, is that what we’re looking at right now?”
NADLER: “I’m not sure what you mean.”
BOLDUAN: “What do you mean by everything could be on the table?”
NADLER: “Literally, everything would be on the table. We would have to see — from everything --“ [crosstalk]
BOLDUAN: “Because that’s going further — you’re very careful on the issue of impeachment."
NADLER: "Yes, I'm very careful because we don't know --" [crosstalk]
BOLDUAN: "You're very cautious with the language."
NADLER: “-- we don’t know at this point what evidence there will be, what -- what -- what -- evidence of what misdeeds there will be. But you cannot rule it out. You cannot rule anything out at this point. Especially if the president takes more actions that add up to evidence of obstruction of justice.”
BOLDUAN: “If he’s fired, do you think it adds up to obstruction of justice?”
NADLER: “I think that’s another step that would be evidence toward that conclusion.”