EXCERPT:
COLWIN: "It is the key question for this judge. He needs to decide whether she compromised her integrity by hiring what seems to be her lover although she testified under oath the relationship did not start until after he was hired but there is competing testimony and Nathan also justified likely that he was also romantically involved with her until her hire but they’re competing testimony. So ultimately the judge has to decide whether or not number one she lied under oath it’s obviously very critical because if you have a prosecutor who lied under oath there is competing testimony that relationship started before he was hired so that is number one. But there are some criminal charges that need to be looked into and then secondly whether or not the relationship somehow influenced her reasoning behind prosecuting former President Trump. If she compromised her integrity and the discretion she has wide discretion as a prosecutor to come after individuals or criminal activity, if she use the prosecution of former President Trump to number one, fatten the wallets of her lover that’s been established by the testimony we have heard. There’s a record saying Nathan Wade was paid hundreds of thousands of dollars for his assistance in the prosecution of former President Trump. If they have as reason because he gained so much in terms of compensation due to the work he did on this case and they spent it together because they were in this relationship it’s a very problematic for her and Nathan Wade on many different levels. But there disqualified the key will be whether or not the prosecution continues. My guess is it will, just maybe with other prosecutors."