Grabien Mobile App
Get Grabien on the go!

Gregg Jarrett: The Media Is Not Entitled To Be Presented with Evidence

‘Well, the unabashed arrogance of the media was on full display today’
By Grabien Staff

HANNITY: “Three states would have to flip for the President. That is a pretty big effort. You know, what are the best arguments and where do you see this going within the court system?”

JARRETT: “Well, the unabashed arrogance of the media was on full display today, as they were demanding to see the evidence. They are not entitled to see the evidence. Evidence is presented in a court of law, eyewitnesses, affidavits, sworn under penalty of perjury. That is how the legal process goes. So as Giuliani pointed out, he has to go state by state. It takes time. It’s taken two weeks to gather that evidence, and now he is going about the arduous task of presenting it judge by judge, jurisdiction by jurisdiction. But look, where you have blank ballots that are assigned names, thousands of them, and then filled in with votes, when you have thousands of backdated ballots, when you have ballots that don’t match valid voters, when you have ballots that don’t match signatures, and importantly, where you have the integrity of voting machines and the critical software called into serious question because there is a backdoor that allows tens of thousands of votes to be transferred from one candidate to another instantaneously, with the click of a mouse or the stroke of a keyboard, these need to be looked at in a court of law. That is how the process works. Of course, the media could be searching for this evidence on their own, but they wouldn’t do that because that would jeopardize their coronation of their chosen candidate, Joe Biden, and it would be the responsible journalistic thing to do, and they’ve proven they won’t do it.”

Like our work? Support the cause.