EXCERPT:
DEAN: "I was quite surprised. I have made a quick first trip through it. It’s 213 pages, very closely reasoned. The dissents are more about state law and how procedure and state law operate or should not operate, and whether this was a proper question to be before the state court or a federal political question. What’s most striking though, Kaitlan, is, it’s very much like the reasoning of the conservative legal community. There have been a number of law journal articles that have come out by Federalist Society, credentialed law professors, who have raised this issue. It sounds like this court has very much followed that line of thinking and interpretation of the 14th Amendment."