Rep. Swalwell on Cohen/Trump: ‘Circumstantial Evidence’ Is ‘Treated the Same in the Law as Direct Evidence’
‘We have circumstantial evidence which is treated the same in the law as direct evidence’
Nov 30, 2018 3:30 PM
By Grabien Staff
Current TimeВ 0:00
/
DurationВ -:-
Loaded: 0%
0:00
Stream TypeВ LIVE
Remaining TimeВ --:-
В
1x
2x
1.75x
1.5x
1.25x
1x, selected
0.75x
0.5x
Chapters
descriptions off, selected
captions settings, opens captions settings dialog
captions off, selected
This is a modal window.
The media could not be loaded, either because the server or network failed or because the format is not supported.
Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window.
End of dialog window.
EXCERPT:
SWALWELL: “We also, as it relates to the June 9 meeting, we have strong evidence that Trump and Cohen talked almost daily about campaign stuff and so, again, when you take circumstantially what we know about that relationship and how close Trump’s office was to Cohen’s —“ HARLOW: “I understand what you think. But I'm just asking, do you have hard evidence that Michael Cohen lied to your committee about anything else, hard evidence right now?” SWALWELL: “We have circumstantial evidence which is treated the same in the law as direct evidence.”
