This is a modal window.
Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window.
End of dialog window.
EXCERPT:
BRZEZINSKI: “In your new piece, Jeremy, entitled 'Pundits said Harris won the debate, undecided voters weren’t so sure,' you write in part this: 'In interviews with undecided voters, many of whom the Times has interviewed regularly over the last several months, they acknowledged that Ms. Harris seemed more presidential than Mr. Trump, and they said she laid out a sweeping vision to fix some of the country’s most stubborn problems, but they also said she did not seem much different from Mr. Biden and they wanted change. And most of all, what they wanted to hear and didn’t was the fine print. Voters said they were glad she has a tax and economic plan, but they want to know how it will become law when Washington is so polarized. They know she wants to give assistance to first-time home buyers, but doubted that it was realistic.' And Jeremy, I ask you, is their answer Donald Trump? Because I guess — I guess I see the questions. I think there was only so much that she could do in that debate in order to be as effective as she was. And I agree, there are a lot more questions, of course. I would love to ask Kamala Harris about her leadership style and her plans and how she plans to execute. But are those undecided voters saying, 'I’m going to kind of lean Trump here because I want change?' I don’t get it."