EXCERPT:
COLBERT: “The crux of their argument is that the president wasn’t a guy inciting an angry mob. He was merely a guy expressing free speech near a mob he happened to make angry, saying the former president believed he won and, therefore, was within his rights to “Express his belief that the election results were suspect.” And that argument is backed up by constitutional scholar George Costanza:”
COSTANZA [clip]: “Just remember: It’s not a lie if you believe it.”
COLBERT: “He could also argue there were “Very fine people” on “Both sides” of the soup counter.”