Fauci: What’s Incorrect from Accusers Is NIH Funding an Indirect Grant to Chinese Labs Working on Covid
‘They’re preposterous because we don’t know what the origin of this virus is’
Jun 18, 2024 11:30 AM
By Grabien Staff
Current TimeВ 0:00
/
DurationВ -:-
Loaded: 0%
0:00
Stream TypeВ LIVE
Remaining TimeВ --:-
В
1x
2x
1.75x
1.5x
1.25x
1x, selected
0.75x
0.5x
Chapters
descriptions off, selected
captions settings, opens captions settings dialog
captions off, selected
This is a modal window.
The media could not be loaded, either because the server or network failed or because the format is not supported.
Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window.
End of dialog window.
EXCERPT:
FAUCI: “Yeah, well, they’re — they’re preposterous. Because if — we don’t know what the origin of this virus is. It either somehow came out of a lab where Chinese scientists went into the environment and got infected and played with it and it came out, or it was a natural spillover from an animal to a human in the Wuhan market. I keep a completely open mind. The virological evidence, the epidemiological evidence by most qualified virologists strongly favor, though not definitively, strongly favor that it’s a natural occurrence. But since it isn’t definitive, I keep an open mind. What they say that’s incorrect is that the NIH funded a grant in China, an indirect grant, funded a firm in New York that did a subaward to do some surveillance studies on what is out there, which is a perfectly appropriate thing to do. In fact, I would probably be held as being incompetent if I didn’t, if we didn’t do that.”