This is a modal window.
EXCERPT:
FOREMAN: “Walz did make a comment speaking to a group, he‘s done it a couple of times, where he has used language that has suggested that he carried weapons in a fighting situation. As you know, with your contact with the military, I know from coming from a military family, there is a difference between being in a combat area, being involved at a time of war, and actually being in a position where people are shooting at you. There is no evidence that at any time Governor Walz was in a position of being shot at, and some of his language could easily be seen to suggest that he was. So that is absolutely false when he said that about — about gun rights out there. The campaign has essentially come forward to say, look, he had a long career, he would never want to purposely mislead people about this, is what campaigns tend to say. And I‘m sure we haven‘t heard the end of this, but it‘s an interesting argument that brings to mind past conflicts we‘ve had in politics where military people start going at each other and then you start saying, ‘Well, what is the basis for this? How much of it is true and what are we to draw from that as voters?’”
(Via Mediaite)
